So, yesterday I was publicly chastised for using the comment section on another person’s blog to engage in open disagreement and discussion with one of the other readers about tolerance, religious and otherwise. It was the religious portion of the discussion that was offensive to at least one of the blog owners. She also said, with regard to my comments, “However, in all the time we’ve written here, I don’t remember anyone ever using OUR comments to go after another reader. That feels a little like having someone who is a guest in my home decide to pick a fight with another guest, and that is unacceptable.”
Apparently the view of this blog owner is that I was brow beating this other person by stating my opposing views and that my views were not to be expressed in “their” space. I was encouraged to use my own space to do that. So, I guess that is what I will do.
My intent was to let it go, or at least wait a day or two and see how I would be feeling then. However, it turns out I’m rather pissed. I wasn’t pissed when all this started. I was not mad at the other commenter, and I did not feel we were having an ugly discussion. Actually I thought the discussion was rather interesting and I was enjoying engaging with this person. We both had strong views, and I think that makes for interesting conversation.
I wasn’t even pissed when the blogger decided to call me out and chastise me publicly. That’s one of my kinks after all, public humiliation. But, I did think it was excessively nasty and a huge escalation from anything that had gone on in the comment section. I was baffled by it.
When did I become pissed? When the other commenter I had been engaging with took the opportunity to jump on the bandwagon and tell me to “get a grip” and also to make another catty comment about the possibility of being “yelled” at again. The blog owner? Apparently she found that just fine and assured said commenter that she would not experience that again in that space. It’s fine for me to be attacked because my view was the wrong one, but not fine for me to engage in a civil discussion. Yeah.
So here is the deal. I already apologized over on this other blog for causing a commenter to feel brow beaten or yelled at. I apologized for hitting a hot button for the blog owners and causing them to feel attacked. That was all sincere. I would never want to do that to anyone and if that was the result of my stating my views then certainly I am sorry.
But I don’t understand for the life of me how this whole thing could have escalated to that level. For one thing, unmoderated comments on a blog to me has always implied that discussion and conversation is encouraged. I personally am not interested in reading comments from groupies who never encourage me to think or do anything other than say, “hear hear!”
Neither does this person, apparently, because she doesn’t moderate her comments. Yet, this particular exchange was offensive. Considering I wasn’t even addressing her, I really find that amazing. I guess I don’t think of the comments as my space, actually. I feel everybody has every right to say whatever they feel and that if two readers want to use the comments section to address each other that is up to them.
I really fail to see the point of encouraging discussion otherwise. So, have at it. The comments aren’t my space. If you’re not a spammer, you’re free to share your thoughts here, whatever they are. If you think my religion is a crock of shit, you’re free to say that. If you think I shouldn’t have posted on this other blog or posted this post, you’re free to say that. If you think I’m brow beating someone now, you’re free to say that. If someone else disagrees with you, they are free to say so. That’s how it works over here.
And no, I won’t name names. Those who want to track this down can easily do so, but that is really beside the point.
Go behind the cut to see a discussion about tolerance.
Incidentally, if you would like to have a discussion about judging others, this would be a good place to put it. I’ll get the ball rolling there. Personally, I feel that using a wide brush to paint individuals with is a dangerous thing to do. I think that’s true whether you are talking about Christians, Muslims, Jews, Kinky people, Poly People, Perverts, Lawyers, Musicians, Teachers, Rich People, Poor People, People from Texas, or Martians.
It is never as simple as it appears. To say that only the poor abused minorities should get to defend themselves while those who are lucky enough to be in the mainstream should shut up and accept mischaracterizations because they come from backgrounds that are unfortunate is madness. Should the children pay because their parents or grandparents or great great grandparents in the middle ages were bad?
Discuss away.
I dunno, Bridget– I haven’t met a good Martian yet.
(Sorry, couldn’t resist).
p.s. tried to e-mail you a couple weeks ago
Comment by Indy — June 22, 2009 @ 10:01 PM
You did? Odd, I definitely didn’t get it. I shall try to confirm you have the correct info for me shortly!
Comment by youngbridget — June 22, 2009 @ 10:22 PM
It may seem easy to you, but I can’t figure out how, easily or otherwise, to track down which blog this was on and see it for myself. So I will reply in generalities.
If someone is paying for something, they have the right to run it. However, my impression is that most blogs are hosted for free. Also, you make a good point that unmoderated comments seem an invitation to open exchange.
I can see how someone might feel left out when they blog something, and two other people, in the comments, get off on some entirely different subject and start discussing that. It’s kind of like when a thread is hijacked on a message board or forum. I don’t think it’s cause for being nasty, but it could be annoying.
However, I get the definite sense that that’s not what happened here. You weren’t chastised because you were the one who changed the subject. You were chastised because you expressed an unacceptable opinion. I further imply that you expressed — in our largely atheist, and often specifically anti-Christian kink — the unacceptable opinion that not all Christians are knuckle-dragging, child-beating, woman’s-right-to-control-her-body-denying troglodytes.
Well, that’s the dirty little secret of liberalism, or collectivism, or whatever you want to call it. There is no one less tolerant than the people who constantly yell about tolerance. They are tolerant of anyone who exactly agrees with exactly their opinions, but anyone who deviates in any way from whatever today’s approved version of enlightened orthodoxy is (and you do have to check every day, because it’s constantly changing) obviously listens to Rush Limbaugh 24/7 and drags Negroes behind his pickup truck for his personal amusement.
The irony is that in all the ways that SHOULD matter, you are probably a much better big-L Liberal than whoever criticized you. Compassion, true tolerance, humility, generosity, non-violence — you’ve probably got them bested. But you dared to disagree with one of their pet beliefs, so you are no longer a member of the self-anointed secular sainthood of the self-righteous.
Of course, that’s just a guess — and not exactly an objective one, as you can tell from how I worded it. But if that IS what happened, you have my sympathy. 90 percent of liberals give the other 10 percent a bad name. You’re in the 10 percent.
Comment by Michael — June 22, 2009 @ 11:28 PM
The internet is as public as a wall that can be read and grafitti’ed by anyone. If there is a space for unmoderated comments, that is what it will be used for: you have to accept a degree of distance, even on a topic that you feel very strongly about!
Probably the writer does not know any of those concerned personally, and would not address them in those terms if they were face-to-face: there will always be some who exploit the anonymity to abandon common civilised courtesies.
i’m sorry that your feelings were hurt, and i don’t condone the behaviour of the comenter OR the blog host.
However, if you appear in public…people will see and hear and some will throw things!
No offence, dear Bridget, (and good to see you back on air) But you did say you welcome free speech!
-wishing you well, kannakat
Comment by kannakat — June 24, 2009 @ 3:35 AM
Kannakat, you are of course right. And the thing is, having people respond and react to my statements is one thing. I am perfectly capable of holding my own in a discussion or argument if it goes there.
What ticked me off in this instance was that I was doing just that, and was publicly told my behavior was unacceptable and that I was attacking someone. Then, when that person I was supposedly attacking decided to turn it around and be extremely rude outright, that was 100% acceptable.
In this instance it wasn’t a case of misusing space, it was a case of expressing a forbidden opinion. I can not defend myself because I don’t fall into one of the acceptable categories. And that is really annoying lol
Comment by youngbridget — June 24, 2009 @ 6:47 AM
I did think you got blasted without much cause. I wondered why, wondered whether it was an old scar or a bad day.
But it did jump start you writing on your own blog again. So I guess that’s the silver lining.
sin
Comment by sin — June 24, 2009 @ 7:37 PM